Chain? Belt? Shaft? Which is Better?
Well, if you are thinking in terms of motorcycle fashion apparel, I would recommend chrome, shaft-drive pendants, hanging from a series of gold chains that are attached to a leather belt with a chrome bike-buckle to secure your pants. And that should give you a good indication on why I am writing about bikes instead of fashion.
OK, here’s the multiple choice quiz you wished for in elementary school: What is the best way to drive power from a motorcycle engine to its rear wheel?
- Chain Drive?
- Belt Drive?
- Shaft Drive?
If you answered “1,” “2,” or “3,” you are right!
(Wouldn’t that be great if all quizzes were that easy?)
All three are valid and workable technologies. In addition, they’ve all been around a very long time. “Which is best” depends upon your type of riding and/or personal preference.
First of all, for some riding applications “no thinking is required” because you won’t have a choice, but other types of riding can benefit from a little forethought.
No Thinking Required:
- Dirt bikes come with chains
- Dual purpose motorbikes have chain drives
- “Most” sport bikes are driven by chains (with rare belt-drive exceptions)
- In fact, the majority of motorcycles are chain driven
- However, most large touring bikes are usually equipped with a shaft drive
Thinking Required:
- Cruisers are the most popular type of bikes to find belt drives, although you can buy cruisers with shaft or chain drives
- Sport-touring bikes primarily include chain or shaft drives
- Most adventure-touring bikes are driven by chain or shaft with a rare belt-drive exception
OK, so what’s the difference already!?
Stated briefly, chain drives are the most economical way to transmit power to the rear wheel. They also convey the greatest percentage of engine power in the process. Chain drives are by far the most popular drive mechanism in motorbikes around the world. On the other hand, they also require the most maintenance, are dirty, and not as smooth as a shaft or belt drive. Bear in mind that the most routine motorcycle maintenance required of a rider is taking care of those metal chain links! (Unless you include putting gas in the tank.) So, reducing that chain maintenance equates to greater rider enjoyment.
Hence, belt drives are a viable option where available (mostly, but not exclusively, on cruisers). Not only do belts require less frequent adjustments than a chain, they also last longer, so the whole task of having them replaced is reduced. Belt drives are cleaner since there is no chain lube flying around to mess up your bike or that belt in your jeans with gold chains and chrome, shaft pendants dangling around. Belt drives are also smoother than chain drives.
And finally, there are shaft drives: the same technology that is used in automobiles. Shaft drives are smooth. They are the lowest maintenance of the three. (The shaft drive oil reservoir needs to be infrequently drained and replaced). They are quiet and clean. Motorcycle shaft drives are also heavier and more expensive than chain or belt drives. Furthermore, a small amount of performance is lost while moving that power from the engine to the rear wheel via some extra gears in the shaft drive. Hence, you won’t see them on pure performance machines.
In brief, most riders won’t need to decide between chain, belt or shaft drives because so many categories of motorbikes do not offer a choice.
On the other hand, should you be a rider fond of cruisers; or should you be a sports-touring aficionado; or one who likes to ride long distances on pavement and also ride on dirt roads (adventure touring); then you can purchase a bike with the technology of your choice to make your rear wheel go round and round at your whim.
Note: this doesn’t mean any given bike model within these noted categories will give you an option to purchase these different drive methods, it means you can find different bike models within the noted categories of motorbikes that will include your preference.
Most long-distance riders, whether on a cruiser, sport tourer, or adventure tourer will be better served with a shaft drive. But of course you will pay a little more for that smoother, cleaner and low maintenance choice.
Which means that nifty leather belt in your pants with the dangling chrome pendants will not get chain lube on them.
Posted: October 17th, 2007 under Gear.
Comments: 8
Comments
Comment from Steve
Time: November 11, 2008, 10:46 pm
I ride a ‘88 V45 Magna w/shaft drive and don’t experience the quirks mentioned here, and elsewhere, about shaft drive bikes. As a cruiser, it’s not as hot in the curves as sportier bikes, but I push close to it’s limits. It’s definitly smoother, and less maintenance. It probably does lose some power in transfer, but I can’t tell it against other 750 Magnas or Nighthawks.
And, if a shaft drive does tend to lift the rear during acceleration, what difference does it make whether you’re carving right or left?
Comment from Russ
Time: October 24, 2008, 1:19 pm
Belts should be considered only if you don’t mind getting stranded beside the road when it breaks.
I have a Buell Ulysses and it stranded me twice in its first 18,000 miles.
Problem is, the first time was at 12,000 miles and the second just before 18,000 miles so it’s hard to predict the next failure, beyond knowing that it will likely be long before the owner’s manual estimate of 100,000 miles. In any event, the last time it stranded me, at 26,000 miles, it was an an electrical failure - the belt’s still good.
Comment from CHUCK
Time: October 18, 2008, 2:04 pm
I LIKE NEW TECHNOLOGY FORGET CHAIN/BELT DRIVE SHAFT DRIVE IS THE ONLY WAY TO GO ,AZ IS THE ROCK STATE ,I HAD MY EYE ON THE NEW KAWASAKI 1700 NOMAD UNTIL I LOOKED AT THE SPECS. LOOKS LIKE KAWASAKI DONE AWAY WITH AL SHAFT DRIVES ON THERE 2009 BIKES, LOOKS LIKE I PASS ON THE 1700 NOMAD TO BAD AL THE NEW DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY ON THE 2009 BIKES WHY WOULD THEY CHANGE TO BELT DRIVE, BIG BUCKS SAVED ON BELT /CHAIN VIS SHAFT DRIVE TORQUE /HP VERY LITTLE EFFECT, WHO KNOWS I CAN WAIT TILL 2010.NO WAY TO CUT COST .
Comment from AKPhill
Time: October 7, 2008, 8:54 pm
I have ridden all three and the I really dont care for is the shaft drive its smooth down the highway but you go into corners to the right and it will try to throw you out of the corner you had to be ready I never had those problems with chain or belts currently riding a belt ouch
Comment from MC-G
Time: September 16, 2008, 3:47 pm
Hi Julian,
Belt-drives require less frequent adjustments than a chain. However, on a “scooter,” where less power is transferred from the engine, through the belt, to the rear wheel (compared to a big cruiser), very little adjustment is required over time. In fact, depending upon how much you ride, it may be worth checking once a year. (Consult the owner’s manual for more specific maintenance advice).
Best,
MCG
Comment from Julian Anderson
Time: September 16, 2008, 5:13 am
belts seem like a good option i guess.im getting a scooter soon which has a belt..
can u give me any tips that can help me maintain it?
Comment from Michael
Time: July 3, 2008, 6:44 am
I have ridden all three and shaft I do not like because it makes the fear end go up and down with the throttle,
Chain is good because you can change the gear ratio and have better control of how your bike performs and also stronger than belts,
I like belts because of the no maintenance to them and do not fling oil all over the rim,
but they have been known to break and with a chain you can carry a couple of links and piece of the chain just in case you do break it,
shaft you do not have to worry about breaking the chain or belt but goes up and down with throttle movement,
also the proper way to lube the chain is take it off and brush all the grime off of it and soak it in a oil bath then the next day hang it up to drip the extra oil off and then put it on so I would think if you have chain drive then you need to chains,
Now that I have you confused I think with my bike that has a belt might get a chain down the road because it is a sport bike and I do not think the belt can take the horse power.
Mike
Pingback from Chain vs belt vs shaft - Perth Street Bikes
Time: July 1, 2008, 3:25 pm
[...] new chain and sprockets, and at worst, you can damage bearings from what I’ve been told. Check here D’Art __________________ Remember half the cagers out there are below average [...]















Write a comment